Russian Figure

You can number the illustrations within the section. In this If number is an illustration of the section number and serial number of illustrations, separated by a period (eg, Figure 1.1). If necessary, illustrations may have a name and descriptive information (caption text). The word "Figure" and the name is placed after the explanatory data. Illustrations of each application represent a separate numbered in Arabic numerals with the addition to the number designation application (for example: Figure A.3). When referring to illustrations should be written: "… in accordance with Figure 2" in cross-numbering, "…

in accordance with Figure 1.2" in the numbering within the section. Graphs showing the qualitative dependence depicted in the plane bounded by the coordinate axes, arrows ending. Letter symbols and functions of the argument without guidance units to measure them put down to the left of the coordinate axes and under the x-axis respectively. Along the axis can specify false coordinates of some characteristic points. Should refer to the document as a whole or its parts, and applications. References to sections, paragraphs, tables and figures do not allowed, except for subsections, paragraphs, tables and illustrations in this document.

References to sources should be provided in the slanting brackets with numbers on the list of sources used. For example, / 3, p.25 /. Applications are made out as the continuation of this document, in its subsequent pages. The text of the thesis to all applications must be referenced. Applications are placed in order of their references in the text of the paper. Each application should begin on a new page showing at the top middle of the page speech application, its symbols and degrees, separating it from the title by two single-spaced. The application must have a title that written symmetrically with respect to the text, with a capital letter as a separate line. Applications refer to the Russian alphabet in capital letters, starting with A, except the letters E, H, I, O, W, L, N, Z.

Spanish Agency

A recent study conducted by the Spanish Agency for data protection (AEPD) in hospitals in almost all Spain, revealed serious deficiencies in the treatment of medical information. The situation is as worrying, these centres by their nature deal with health data, typified by the special protection and how sensitive data protection regulations and therefore require high level security measures. For more information see Dalton Philips. In total it has been consulted 562 hospitals public and private throughout Spain with the exception of the communities which have their own protection agencies of data such as Madrid, Basque country and Catalonia and therefore own departments on the matter. However, in Madrid and the Basque country responded that the private centers. The result is alarming, since the lack of implementation of appropriate security measures and the existence of serious deficiencies on the custody and treatment of the personal data of patients detected in more than 200 hospitals. Particularly serious is the situation of the public health where have been found far more failures that in private and despite that up to 66% of them do not perform security audits biennially as it forces the organic law 15/1999 of protection of data of Personal character (LOPD). Failures in the implementation of measures of security and custody of information cause a great risk of improper access to information with sensitive data by unauthorized persons.

And so, 30% public centres lacks measures to avoid the loss of clinical documentation during its transport. In 35% of hospitals medical records file lacks mechanisms that prevent its opening, i.e. are normally stored on shelves in places easily accessible by outsiders or without the relevant authorization. About 40% of 15% of private and public health centers violate the obligation to keep a record of the guarded health information access. In addition, on many occasions, is nor complies with the duty of information at the time of collection of the personal data of patients. It should be noted that the number of complaints has increased significantly in recent years and the main complaints put forward by the complainants are related to the improper dissemination of personal information of special protection, the abandonment of medical histories in containers of public roads, its storage in non-restricted areas, or the loss of histories in automation processes. 123 Allegations were presented in 2009 and so far this year already go 100, in addition to hundreds of requests for protection of rights by persons who have encountered difficulties accessing your own data or their relatives.