This transformation happens by means of the work. This as Marx, in the capitalist countries is the main cause of coisificao of the worker, this if of the one by means of mechanisms created by the detainers of the means of production (bourgeois). The desumanizao of the worker happens by means of a process that Marx, intitles of alienation that if of the one by means of three stages: ‘ ‘ the 1) worker becomes related with the product of its other people’s work as something it, dominates who it and it he is adverse; 2) the activity of the worker neither is under its domain, it perceives as stranger proper itself; 3) the generic or productive life of the human being only becomes half of life for the worker ‘ ‘ (one has touched of classics, p 52) the wage in the marxist conception has for purpose to only guarantee the basic subsistence of the worker, however the product it becomes inaccessible the worker for the fact of this not to have conditions financial to usufruct. 3. Fight of classrooms as product of the economic structure the marxist anthropology understands the man as to be of relations. These as already had been presented are product of the production relations that throughout history if they had shown as fight of classrooms.

The communist manifesto is initiated with affirmation of that the social classrooms had always been faced. Marx affirms that ‘ ‘ the history of all the societies that had existed until today is the history of the fight of classes’ ‘ (manifest Communist, p 45). Fight that always finished with the transformation would revolutionize of all the society or for the collapse of the classrooms in fight. It is important to perceive that this fight is not natural because human being does not come from the nature as Hobbes in leviat defended when it treated on the egoistic nature of the man. The social conflict originates from the economic structure that are marked by the antagonism between bourgeois (proprietors of the means of production) and proletariat (unprovided of ownership them means of production). The state in Hobbes had as function to guarantee the social order, already in Marx it is of it that it appears the social inaqualities.

Marx if did not worry in demonstrating if the man was by its very nature good or badly, as the example of Rousseau had made other philosophers, but, he displayed in historical way the inevitable conflict between the modern bourgeoisie and proletariat. In which this by means of the revolutionary process would destroy the bourgeoisie inaugurating a society without classrooms, putting end the social inaqualities.