Introduction In recent years, since the early 90s of last century, and ending with the present day, continuing the fall value and credibility of political economy in the social sciences. This is due, primarily, with the process of disintegration of the USSR and the collapse of the world socialist system. This caused a collapse of those sciences which, one way or another, used socialist ideology in the political and class struggle. Re-evaluated social values, including in the field of science. In the heat of the "democratization" anathema were put entire scientific discipline, was the destruction of a cultural and scientific formation. This period can be compared Only since the Great Inquisition. Did not pass this sad process and political economy. First of all, the discipline has suffered only because of its name.
Dilettantism of Democrats saw in science the word "political" kind of sedition, although no political overtones that the word in the title of this science is not carried. Uninformed people identified with the political economy of the Marxist-Leninist political economy, not going into details, that the discipline was born long before, both from the pen of Karl Marx was published in his famous "Capital". I must say that the term "political economy" was first introduced into use French economist at AG Monkretenom (1576-1621) to describe a range of economic sciences. Now that was long enough to destroy dissent subsided fervor, it's time to more meaningful action, namely, came time for the audit of the theoretical legacy, which left us with Marx in economic theory.